On Wed, Sep
25, 2013 I
received a
phone call
from a young
lady for a 2nd
opinion. Her
14-year-old
male Maltese
had breathing
difficulties
and was not
eating. Vet 1
diagnosed
anaemia and a
big abdominal
mass. She
advised
surgery but
the owner did
not want it.
So the lady
searched the
internet
forums and
there were
some
recommendations
for her to
phone for Dr
Jason Teo at
Toa Payoh
Vets.
"Dr Teo works
at Toa Payoh
Vets on
Saturdays
only," I said.
"Another vet
at Toa Payoh
Vets will be
OK," she
replied.
"What's the
name of Vet 1
whom you first
consulted?"
"I do not wish
to disclose
her name."
"Did she have
X-rays and
blood test
results for
your dog?" I
asked as she
was telling me
the findings
without the
documentary
evidence.
"Yes," she
said.
"You can ask
Vet 1 to fax
or email to me
at Toa Payoh
Vets," I said.
"I don't think
it is
possible," she
replied.
"Why not? Are
the documents
illegal?" I
asked. "Vets
do pass
clinical
records to
each other
when the owner
seeks a 2nd
opinion. I
have done it
before and
other vets
have done it.
You just have
to phone them
and ask for
the medical
records."
She phoned
later to say
that Vet 1
would want her
to go to the
practice to
take over the
records and so
would be late
for the
appointment.
This was OK
with me.
Around 3 pm
she came and
saw Dr Daniel
first. He had
recorded "4
days of
changed
behaviour,
increased
breathing,
decreased
appetite and
cannot walk.
No vomiting,
diarrhoea and
no change in
diet. Cheese
treat for one
week and
polyuria and
polydipsia.
Blood test
from Vet 1. No
abnormalities
in the liver
and kidneys or
total white
cell count.
But RBC 3.37
(5.5 - 5.8),
HGB 8.4
(12-18) and
HCT 23.9
(37-55) were
very low. I
told the owner
that the gums
were purplish
and the tongue
was pale. This
was not good.
The
mid-abdominal
lump was
solid,
painless and
half the size
of an orange.
What is it?
Vet
1 was
consulted for
a "breathing
problem". She
had taken a
lateral X-ray
showing much
fluid inside
the swollen
abdomen. A
large opaque
areas obscured
the views of
intestines.
Vet 1 recorded
that the heart
was enlarged.
An abdominal
mass pushed
guts up and
above. She
recorded that
the owner was
not keen on
surgery. Dog
was anaemic
and lung
sounds were
dry. She
proposed pain
relief since
surgery was
not
acceptable.
Overall, Vet 1
was spot on in
her diagnosis
but the owner
was not
satisfied.
"Is it because
you went when
the practice
was going to
close?" I
asked.
"Yes," she
said.
Sometimes it
is difficult
to satisfy the
owner on the
first
consultation
in a medical
condition with
no cure except
surgery.
Yet this dog
was 14 years
old, very thin
and I would
say emaciated.
Surgery would
kill him. So I
don't even
want to
propose
surgery as
this dog will
never survive
the long time
needed to
remove this
large
abdominal
lump. In any
case, the
young couple
was never in
favour of it
as they must
have done
their internet
research and
know the high
risks
involved..
But what is
this large
abdominal lump
and what
should the
couple do?
"Euthanase the
dog," one
young lady et
suggested when
I spoke to her
after X-raying
two views of
the dog's
chest and
abdomen at her
practice.
"This dog is
suffering and
the owner
should not
prolong her
suffering."
"The owner
does not want
euthanasia," I
replied.
"Why? Is it
for religious
reasons?"
"It is for
personal
reasons," I
know of owners
who rather not
put the old
companion to
sleep by
lethal
injection at
the onset of
signs and
symptoms of
difficulty in
breathing. In
this case,
there might be
medication to
alleviate such
a condition.
"There was one
government vet
before your
time," I said
to this young
lady vet who
had worked for
over a year in
another
practice. "He
is now
retired. He
recommended
euthanasia so
many times
that he has a
reputation to
be avoided.
This is
because the
owners would
forecast that
he would
advise
euthanasia in
many sick
cases.
"His intention
was to save
money for the
owners but he
gained the
reputation of
being an
"euthanasia"
vet to be
avoided at all
costs by pet
lovers with
sick pets.
"In this case,
the couple is
against
euthanasia.
They want to
know what is
the nature of
the abdominal
tumour." Dr
Daniel had
proposed
ultrasound
scanning. From
my reading of
the couple,
they want an
acceptable
solution such
that the dog
would live the
last few days
of his life
without pain."
What more can
be done other
than
ultrasound?
Dr Daniel
elaborated on
the causes of
the swollen
abdomen -
bleeding,
chyle, fluid
from heart
failure since
the liver and
kidneys were
OK based on
blood test
from Vet 1,
peritonitis.
He also
advised
surgery to
remove the
abdominal mass
as the only
option. He
advised
abdomino-centesis
to draw out
the fluid to
send to the
lab for
examination
but sedation
would be
required and
this would be
risky as it
may kill the
dog. So the
couple did not
accept his
suggestion and
wanted to take
the dog home.
I let Dr
Daniel handle
the case to
the conclusion
but I did give
my take on
this medical
condition.
What should be
done for this
dog if surgery
was not an
option? "There
is no need for
sedation," I
said to the
couple. "We
need to draw
out the
abdominal
fluid so that
your dog can
breathe easier
at least for
the next 2
days and start
eating." Each
vet has his or
her own
opinion and my
opinion was
that
abdomino-centesis
could be done
without much
pain on this
ill dog and so
without any
risk of death.
The only risk
is in putting
the needle
into the
abdominal
mass. This was
what I was
concerned and
so was the
thinking
behind the
young lady vet
who looked at
the X-ray with
me earlier
after X-ray.
"The needle
might puncture
this big
lump," she
said..
"Not
if you slide
the needle
under the
umbilical skin
area," I did
that with a
19G needle and
fresh blood
came out. Dr
Daniel
inserted a
finer
butterfly clip
needle and
withdrew
another small
amount of
blood. Total
amount was
around 20 ml.
The blood
clotted soon
indicating
that bleeding
was very
recent.
This blood
collection in
a bottle was
shown to the
couple as they
wanted to know
the cause of
anaemia and
the nature of
the abdominal
tumour. No
exploratory
surgery but
just to know
what the
abdominal mass
is.